After being charged by the Department of Justice for acting as an unregistered foreign agent for the United Arab Emirates, DigitalBridge Group board member Thomas Barrack has relinquished that position, according to an SEC filing this morning that said, “Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. resigned as a member of the board of directors of DigitalBridge Group, Inc. Mr. Barrack’s decision was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to its operations, polices or practices.”
Barrack, a private equity investor and longtime friend of former president Donald Trump and chair of his 2017 inaugural committee was arrested yesterday and is currently in jail in Los Angeles, awaiting a bail hearing next Monday.
He was charged with two other men in a seven-count indictment in federal court in Brooklyn, New York.
According to a detention memo, the evidence of Barrack’s guilt in the case is “overwhelming”.
The indictment is available here.
DigitalBridge was likely aware that Barrack was under investigation by the US government since the investigation has been going on for almost two years and Barrack’s spokesperson, according to CNBC, said that he has “made himself [Barrack] voluntarily available to investigators from the outset. He is not guilty and will be pleading not guilty.”
Barrack had been stepping away from the company after Marc Ganzi joined Colony Capital in July 2019. President and CEO Ganzi has been scaling back the company’s real estate investments in order to focus exclusively on digital infrastructure such as cell towers, small cells and data centers.
Colony Capital rebranded into DigitalBridge on June 22 with its stock reaching a high of $8.10. Today, it closed at $6.87.
“In our view, his voluntary [Barrack] resignation was the best outcome for the company, both as it relates to removing any lingering headline risk and accelerating the timeline for his departure,” the financial analysts at B. Riley Securities wrote in a note to investors, according to LightReading.
“In our estimation, there had been widespread shareholder dissatisfaction with his continued presence on the board, even in a limited role. As such, his voluntary resignation should be viewed as a net positive for the company.”